PD Array ToolsICT Trading EducationArticle 16 of 100
FVG and Imbalance Trading: How to Use Fair Value Gaps for ICT Entries
Not every part of a Fair Value Gap is an equal entry. The gap has three distinct zones with very different reliability, and knowing exactly where within it to enter is what separates a precise FVG trade from a guess.
The Inner Circle Traders
Updated July 2026
9 min read
Cluster: PD Array Tools
Key Takeaways
- Not every part of an FVG is an equal entry — the gap has three distinct zones with different reliability
- The Consequent Encroachment (CE), the exact 50% midpoint of the gap, is generally considered the highest-probability entry point
- Entries at the very edge of the gap (top or bottom) are lower-probability than the CE
- Confirmation on a lower timeframe strengthens any FVG entry
- A valid FVG trade needs a clear stop loss beyond the gap and a target at the nearest liquidity draw
If you understand what a Fair Value Gap is, covered in full in Fair Value Gap vs Order Block, this article skips straight to the part that actually matters for trading: exactly where within the gap to enter, how to confirm it, and a complete worked example.
The Three Zones Within a Fair Value Gap
Most FVG education treats the gap as a single, uniform zone — but it is more useful to think of it as three distinct bands, each with different reliability for a reaction.
Figure 1 — The near edge and far edge of the gap are lower-probability reaction zones. The Consequent Encroachment (CE) at the exact midpoint is the highest-probability entry.
Near edge. The first part of the gap price reaches — often where the move first stalls. A reaction here is possible but lower-probability, since price has not yet meaningfully filled the inefficiency.
Consequent Encroachment (CE). The exact 50% midpoint of the gap. This is the zone covered in detail in the next section, and the single most actionable piece of information in this article.
Far edge. The deepest possible fill of the gap. A reaction this deep is the least likely outcome of the three — if price reaches this far, the original imbalance may be more fully resolved than a typical FVG-based entry expects.
What is the Consequent Encroachment (CE)?
The Consequent Encroachment, or CE, is the exact midpoint of a Fair Value Gap — the 50% level between the top and bottom of the gap. It is generally considered the highest-probability reaction zone within the gap, and many ICT traders treat it as their default entry reference rather than the gap’s outer edges.
Simple definition
CE = the 50% midpoint of a Fair Value Gap. It represents a kind of internal equilibrium within the imbalance itself — not an arbitrary split, but the point most consistently associated with a meaningful reaction.
The reasoning mirrors the broader premium/discount framework covered in our ICT PD Array guide: just as a dealing range has a 50% equilibrium dividing premium from discount, a Fair Value Gap has its own internal equilibrium at the CE, dividing the upper and lower halves of the imbalance.
Rules for a Valid FVG Entry
Price must genuinely return into the gap. A close approach that never actually trades into the FVG range does not count — the entry only becomes valid once price is inside the gap itself.
Look for rejection or structural confirmation at the CE specifically. Rather than entering blindly the moment price touches the CE, look for a lower-timeframe rejection candle or a micro structural shift confirming the reaction at that level.
Confirm alignment with your daily bias before entering. An FVG entry against your established daily bias is a lower-probability, counter-trend trade — the same caution that applies to every other PD array tool applies here too.
FVG Entry, Stop Loss, and Target — A Worked Example
Here is the complete framework applied to one chart: entry at the CE, stop loss beyond the far edge, and target at the nearest liquidity draw.
Figure 2 — Entry taken at the CE, stop loss placed beyond the far edge of the gap, and target set at the nearest liquidity draw above.
Entry. Taken at or near the CE, ideally with some lower-timeframe confirmation of a reaction at that specific level rather than entering the instant price touches it.
Stop loss. Placed beyond the far edge of the gap — if price trades through the entire FVG without reacting, the original premise for the trade is invalidated.
Target. Set at the nearest liquidity draw in the direction of the trade. See our guide to Liquidity Sweeps for how to identify this target precisely.
Is "Imbalance" the Same as FVG?
Yes. “Imbalance” and “Fair Value Gap” are used interchangeably throughout ICT trading education, in the same way “liquidity sweep” and “liquidity grab” are treated as the same concept (see our Liquidity Sweep guide for that comparison). Both terms describe the same underlying price phenomenon — the unfilled range left behind by a strong displacement move. There is no meaningful distinction to learn between the two.
Frequently Asked Questions
FVG Confluence: What Makes One FVG Better Than Another
Not all Fair Value Gaps are equal. An FVG on a 1-minute chart during the Asian session has almost no institutional significance. An FVG on a 15-minute chart that forms during the New York open kill zone, immediately after a liquidity sweep, and sits inside a 4H order block — that is a high-confluence FVG with strong institutional backing.
The hierarchy of FVG quality: first, the timeframe. Higher timeframe FVGs (4H, daily) carry more weight than lower timeframe ones. Second, the session. FVGs that form during kill zones (London, New York) are more significant than those formed during dead hours. Third, the cause. FVGs that form immediately after a liquidity sweep or structural break are more significant than random displacement candles. Fourth, the position. FVGs in discount (bullish) or premium (bearish) appropriate to the trade direction are higher quality.
When you have a 15M FVG that forms during the NY open after an SSL sweep, sits inside a 4H bullish order block, and sits in the discount zone — you have the highest quality FVG entry available. All four quality factors align. These are the setups to size up on.
The First Presented FVG Concept
ICT specifically teaches the concept of the First Presented FVG — the first Fair Value Gap that forms after the market opens in the current session, particularly at the New York open. This first FVG is given priority over subsequent FVGs because it represents the initial institutional displacement of the session.
The logic: at the session open, institutional order flow enters with the strongest conviction for the session’s intended direction. The first displacement and the FVG it creates reflect that initial conviction. Later FVGs in the session may be induced by retail activity, news reactions, or secondary moves — they are less likely to represent primary institutional intent.
When the first presented FVG aligns with the daily bias, sits in the correct premium or discount zone, and forms after a liquidity sweep of the Asian range — it is the priority entry for the entire session. ICT traders who master the first presented FVG concept often find they need only one entry per day rather than searching for multiple setups throughout the session.
Stop Loss and Target Placement for FVG Entries
For a bullish FVG entry, the stop loss goes below the low of the FVG (the low of the third candle in the three-candle FVG formation). This is the level that, if price closes below, invalidates the FVG and shows the bullish imbalance has been fully filled without producing the expected reaction.
The target for an FVG entry is always the draw on liquidity identified in pre-session analysis — typically BSL above (equal highs, prior session high, prior week high). Never target a random price level or a fixed R:R without reference to where the actual liquidity is. The FVG gives you the entry precision; the draw on liquidity gives you the exit logic.
Position sizing from an FVG entry: because the stop is defined and tight (the FVG low), the potential R:R is often 3:1 or greater when the draw on liquidity is meaningful distance away. Use consistent position sizing based on fixed percentage risk per trade — 0.5% to 1% of account per trade is the ICT-recommended approach for students and developing traders.
Watch: FVG Trading: How to Use Fair Value Gaps for ICT Entries
Original ICT teaching on this concept from the Inner Circle Trader YouTube channel.
What is FVG trading?+
FVG trading refers to using a confirmed Fair Value Gap as the basis for a trade entry — typically entering at or near the gap's Consequent Encroachment (the 50% midpoint), with a stop loss beyond the gap and a target at the nearest liquidity draw.
What is an FVG ICT entry?+
An FVG ICT entry is a trade taken when price returns into a confirmed Fair Value Gap, typically at the Consequent Encroachment, with confirmation from a lower-timeframe structural shift or rejection candle, and aligned with the trader's established daily bias.
What is the Consequent Encroachment (CE) of a Fair Value Gap?+
The Consequent Encroachment is the exact 50% midpoint of a Fair Value Gap. It is generally considered the highest-probability reaction zone within the gap, used by most ICT traders as their default reference point for FVG-based entries rather than the gap's outer edges.
Where should the stop loss go on an FVG trade?+
The stop loss should be placed beyond the far edge of the Fair Value Gap — the deepest point of the imbalance. If price trades through the entire gap without reacting, the original premise for the trade is considered invalidated.
Is imbalance the same as a Fair Value Gap?+
Yes. "Imbalance" and "Fair Value Gap" are used interchangeably in ICT trading education. Both describe the same price phenomenon — an unfilled range left behind by a strong displacement candle. There is no meaningful difference between the two terms.
Test Your Knowledge
5 questions · Takes about 2 minutes
Question 1 of 5
Score: 0
Question 01
Select an answer to continue
Continue Reading — PD Array Tools Cluster
Contents
Learn ICT in a Structured Framework
The mentorship programme takes you from individual concepts to a complete, executable trading system.
Related Articles
Article Cluster
You are reading
PD Array Tools — Article 3 of 9
33% through this cluster